Reading, writing, and analyzing poetry are different aspects of the one genre. In my opinion, the only similarity between the three is that they all involve poetry. Reading poetry is an art form all on its own. For example, there are slam competitions, which emphasize showmanship while reciting poetry. These competitions are about emotion and body language when certain words or lines are being said. As for analyzing poetry, this skill requires the person to be well-versed in all forms poetry takes. As I participated in all of these activities that pertain to poetry, I can confidently say that they are different. Poetry is a versatile art form; to be a true poet, one must master all its forms.
Not one side helped me with the other. As I said before, I think they are different aspects of poetry. Each element of poetry is a skill that can be mastered independently. I can understand how to analyze poetry, but it does not translate well. Each component of poetry has its own set of rules and methods. The way I analyzed poetry could not help me write it. Writing poetry requires a specific skill set to manipulate words and sounds to fit any of the many themes poetry can take form.
Poetry is a dying art form. Students nowadays only want to learn topics that will help them in the long run. There is nothing wrong with poetry, but it is a niche art form only used by a small group. Rap is a form of poetry, which may be the music genre that keeps poetry alive. Besides that, I do not see how a poet is meant to make any money in this environment. For that reason alone, poetry is not a worthwhile skill to learn.
